Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Filters

2021 - 20243

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Te Morenga LSubject: search.filters.subject.Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Awareness, support, and opinions of healthy food and drink policies: a survey of staff and visitors in New Zealand healthcare organisations.
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2024-08-12) Gerritsen S; Rosin M; Te Morenga L; Jiang Y; Kidd B; Shen S; Umali E; Mackay S; Ni Mhurchu C
    Background In 2016, a voluntary National Healthy Food and Drink Policy (hereafter, “the Policy”) was released to encourage public hospitals in New Zealand to provide food and drink options in line with national dietary guidelines. Five years later, eight (of 20) organisations had adopted it, with several preferring to retain or update their own institutional-level version. This study assessed staff and visitors’ awareness and support for and against the Policy, and collected feedback on perceived food environment changes since implementation of the Policy. Methods Cross-sectional electronic and paper-based survey conducted from June 2021 to August 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to present quantitative findings. Free-text responses were analysed following a general inductive approach. Qualitative and quantitative findings were compared by level of implementation of the Policy, and by ethnicity and financial security of participants. Results Data were collected from 2,526 staff and 261 visitors in 19 healthcare organisations. 80% of staff and 56% of visitors were aware of the Policy. Both staff and visitors generally supported the Policy, irrespective of whether they were aware of it or not, with most agreeing that “Hospitals should be good role models.” Among staff who opposed the Policy, the most common reason for doing so was freedom of choice. The Policy had a greater impact, positive and negative, on Māori and Pacific staff, due to more frequent purchasing onsite. Most staff noticed differences in the food and drinks available since Policy implementation. There was positive feedback about the variety of options available in some hospitals, but overall 40% of free text comments mentioned limited choice. 74% of staff reported that food and drinks were more expensive. Low-income staff/visitors and shift workers were particularly impacted by reduced choice and higher prices for healthy options. Conclusions The Policy led to notable changes in the healthiness of foods and drinks available in NZ hospitals but this was accompanied by a perception of reduced value and choice. While generally well supported, the findings indicate opportunities to improve implementation of food and drink policies (e.g. providing more healthy food choices, better engagement with staff, and keeping prices of healthy options low) and confirm that the Policy could be expanded to other public workplaces.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    What helps and hinders metformin adherence and persistence: a qualitative study exploring the views of people with type 2 diabetes
    (New Zealand Medical Association, 2021-06-04) Parkin L; Maclennan K; Te Morenga L; Inder M; Moata'ane L
    AIM: To explore the views of people with type 2 diabetes who had initiated metformin monotherapy about what influences adherence and persistence. METHODS: We recruited participants through primary care, using purposive sampling, and undertook face-to-face, audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews with 10 Māori, 10 Pacific, and 10 non-Māori non-Pacific patients who had started metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes within the previous two years. A thematic analysis was undertaken using the Theory of Planned Behaviour as the overall theoretical framework. RESULTS: The perceived benefits of taking metformin included improving glycaemic control, preventing or slowing the progression of type 2 diabetes, and avoiding serious complications. Side effects (predominantly gastrointestinal) were the most commonly cited disadvantage. Participants employed a variety of strategies to help them take metformin regularly. Key reasons for initial sub-optimal adherence and persistence were side effects and not accepting the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Subsequently, omitting to take tablets was commonly unintentional (due to 'forgetfulness'). For many Pacific participants, changes in routine related to community and church events, or shift work, contributed to sub-optimal adherence. Some Māori participants would have preferred to use traditional medicines. CONCLUSION: We identified a number of factors within the scope of healthcare services that may assist healthcare providers to focus on, and address, some of the issues that appear to be of primary importance to people when they are prescribed metformin.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Food, nutrition and cancer: perspectives and experiences of New Zealand cancer survivors
    (New Zealand Medical Association, 2021-11-12) Peniamina R; Davies C; Moata'ane L; Signal L; Tavite H; Te Morenga L; McLean R
    AIM: This research sought to understand and describe cancer survivors' perspectives and post-diagnosis experiences of food and nutrition, with a particular focus on barriers to healthy eating, health equity, and Māori and Pacific perspectives. METHOD: Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with cancer survivors from three different ethnic groups (Māori, Pacific Peoples, and New Zealand European). Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify both similar and contrasting experiences and perspectives in relation to topics of interest. Data analysis also sought to identify any trends indicating differences between ethnic groups. RESULTS: Limited awareness of the role nutrition has in cancer recovery or prevention, combined with little or no access to nutrition advice/support, meant that healthy dietary change was not a focus for some cancer survivors in this study, whereas others invested considerable time and money accessing nutrition information and support outside of cancer care services. Financial limitations (eg, cost of healthy food and low income) and lack of practical support were also important barriers to post-diagnosis healthy eating. CONCLUSION: There is a need for more widely available cancer-specific nutrition advice and support in New Zealand. Interventions to address financial barriers and increase access to cancer-related nutrition advice and support have the potential to improve cancer outcomes and reduce inequities in cancer outcomes.