Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.collaboration

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Co-production and conservation physiology: outcomes, challenges and opportunities arising from reflections on diverse co-produced projects
    (y Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology, 2025-07-18) Cooke SJ; Bett NN; Hinch SG; Adolph CB; Hasler CT; Howell BE; Schoen AN; Mullen EJ; Fangue NA; Todgham AE; Cheung MJ; Johnson RC; Olstad RS-T; Sisk M; Sisk CC; Franklin CE; Irwin RC; Irwin TR; Lewandrowski W; Tudor EP; Ajduk H; Tomlinson S; Stevens JC; Wilcox AAE; Giacinti JA; Provencher JF; Dupuis-Smith R; Dwyer-Samuel F; Saunders M; Meyer LCR; Buss P; Rummer JL; Bard B; Fuller A; Helmuth B
    As a relatively nascent discipline, conservation physiology has struggled to deliver science that is relevant to decision-makers or directly useful to practitioners. A growing body of literature has revealed that co-produced research is more likely to generate knowledge that is not only relevant, but that is also embraced and actionable. Co-production broadly involves conducting research collaboratively, inclusively, and in a respectful and engaged manner - spanning all stages from identifying research needs to study design, data collection, interpretation and application. This approach aims to create actionable science and deliver meaningful benefits to all partners involved. Knowledge can be co-produced with practitioners/managers working for regulators or stewardship bodies, Indigenous communities and governments, industry (e.g. fishers, foresters, farmers) and other relevant actors. Using diverse case studies spanning issues, taxa and regions from around the globe, we explore examples of co-produced research related to conservation physiology. In doing so, we highlight benefits and challenges while also identifying lessons for others considering such an approach. Although co-production cannot guarantee the ultimate success of a project, for applied research (such as what conservation physiology purports to deliver), embracing co-production is increasingly regarded as the single-most important approach for generating actionable science to inform conservation. In that sense, the conservation physiology community would be more impactful and relevant if it became commonplace to embrace co-production as demonstrated by the case studies presented here.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Co-production of insights for place-based approaches to revitalise te taiao in Aotearoa New Zealand
    (John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of New Zealand Geographical Society, 2024-11-16) Turner JA; Stokes S; Jones RTH; Hemi M; Collins H; Vannier C; Burkitt L; Bradley C; Doehring K; Macintosh KA; Young J; Roskruge N; Perry-Smith P; Iosefa RK; Walker N; Young F; Bell A; McDermott A; Wood C
    Communities across Aotearoa New Zealand are collaborating to reverse ecological decline, but little attention has been given to understanding the deeper relationship required with our physical and socio-cultural landscapes. We used knowledge co-production to develop 11 insights to support place-based strategies that nurture a collective responsibility to revitalise both people and place. Twenty-five subject matter experts across communities, government, industry and research drew from their collective expertise and the review of 63 local-to-global case study examples of farm-to-community-scale place-based approaches. A key output from this work is an Aotearoa New Zealand framework that diagrammatically represents the interdisciplinary nature of the 11 insights.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The value of textile education and industry partnerships
    (Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 31/05/2016) Heffernan S; Kane, F
    Textile research/industry partnerships have recently gained momentum in New Zealand. This paper makes a preliminary account by focusing on the benefits of the collaboration to Massey University Master of Design postgraduates, companies, and the academics. The students work on a significant problem faced by a company to rejuvenate business or to produce solutions for a particular or a set of problems. The company gains access to new university research and discoveries and faculty members complement their own academic research by securing funds for graduate students. During a one-year period, the students receive a government-funded scholarship and industry mentoring. The aim is to steer success across the textile value chain from economic and environmental perspectives while balancing academic requirements. Typically, the industry-centered design is developed using iterative processes with a strong emphasis on the role of technology, often requiring the acquirement of new software skills to design with industry equipment. The model establishes best practice to share resources and experiences within the thrust of daily industrial life and the demands of a Master of Design degree. This paper aims to gage the benefits of, and challenges in a range of wool-centered collaborative projects from yarn development to sustainable dye to bedding product development to the revitalization of a weaving mill innovative waste to blue sky solutions for a tannery. The research of novel ideas and process innovation leads to enhanced job placement opportunity and new exports.